Saying
From Linux PARISC Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(What people said about parisc Linux) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | * Now, if PA-RISC was a major architecture, we'd have to figure this out. But as it is, PA-RISC is just about the shittiest RISC ever invented (with original sparc being a strong contender), and let's face it, nobody really uses it. It's a "fun project", but it is not something that we should use to mess up either ACCESS_ONCE() or the MCS locks. | + | Linus Torvalds in an [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/5835 email discussion]: |
| − | + | * ''Now, if PA-RISC was a major architecture, we'd have to figure this out. But as it is, PA-RISC is just about the shittiest RISC ever invented (with original sparc being a strong contender), and let's face it, nobody really uses it. It's a "fun project", but it is not something that we should use to mess up either ACCESS_ONCE() or the MCS locks. | |
| + | '' | ||
Latest revision as of 20:28, 8 June 2014
Linus Torvalds in an email discussion:
- Now, if PA-RISC was a major architecture, we'd have to figure this out. But as it is, PA-RISC is just about the shittiest RISC ever invented (with original sparc being a strong contender), and let's face it, nobody really uses it. It's a "fun project", but it is not something that we should use to mess up either ACCESS_ONCE() or the MCS locks.
